carbide<\/a>s due to their regular shape, high hardness, and ability to maintain a consistent electrolytic gap, resulting in high productivity. During fine grinding, mechanical grinding can be performed independently. Diamond electrolytic grinding wheels can be categorized into metal-bonded and electroplated diamond wheels. The former is used for flat and cylindrical grinding of carbide\u00a0molds, while the latter is used for electrolytic form grinding of large batches of single-shaped workpieces and internal cylindrical grinding of small holes. The grinding pressure is generally around 30N\/cm\u00b2. The linear speed of the grinding wheel is typically 1200-2100 m\/min, and the contact length with the workpiece should not exceed 19mm to prevent electrolyte boiling.<\/p>\nMaterial Removal Rate and Precision<\/h2>\n
The material removal rate of carbides is proportional to the current density. Under specific alloy materials, electrolyte combinations, and electrolyte boiling points, the current density is limited by the anode dissolution rate. The productivity of electrolytic grinding of carbides is generally 0.16cm\u00b3 per 100 A\/min. At a current density of 77.5A\/cm\u00b2, the feed rate for face grinding is 25mm\/min, with a typical dimensional accuracy of \u00b10.025mm per pass. If an additional mechanical grinding pass is performed without electrolysis, the accuracy can reach \u00b10.002mm. When grinding external contours, the corner radius on the workpiece is about 0.025mm, while the roundness radius for internal contours is limited to 0.25-0.38mm. The material removal rate in electrolytic grinding is 4-8 times higher than that of conventional grinding methods.<\/p>\n
Surface Quality<\/h2>\n
The surface roughness achieved by electrolytic grinding of carbides is generally Ra 0.2-0.8\u03bcm, but it can reach Ra 0.025-0.1\u03bcm. The surface of the workpiece resembles that obtained by metallographic polishing, and the hardness of the workpiece does not affect the surface quality. During machining, the processed surface does not develop internal stresses or heat-affected zones, resulting in high surface integrity.<\/p>\n
Equipment and Tools<\/h2>\n
The grinding machine must have sufficient rigidity to maintain precision even under a bending stress of 1 MPa between the grinding wheel and the workpiece. The machine requires corrosion-resistant accessories for pressurizing and filtering the electrolyte. Control equipment, fixtures, and mechanical and electrical systems should be made of suitable materials or coated to operate in a salt spray environment. Conductive diamond grinding wheels are preferred for electrolytic grinding, although non-conductive abrasive wheels can also be used, albeit with less effectiveness. The electrolyte nozzle is typically made of heat-resistant organic glass or equivalent insulating materials. Workpiece fixtures are made of copper or copper alloys. The design should ensure that the cathode and anode parts are insulated during electrolytic grinding to maintain proper machine operation.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Discussion of Key Process Parameters<\/h1>\nCurrent Density and Voltage<\/h2>\n
In electrolytic grinding, current density is the primary factor determining productivity. Productivity increases with higher current density, but excessively high or low current densities can reduce machining precision and surface quality. In practice, voltage should not be increased indefinitely, as excessively high voltages can cause spark discharge, affecting surface quality. For carbide\u00a0electrolytic grinding, the optimal current density is 110 A\/cm\u00b2, with practical current densities ranging from 15-60 A\/cm\u00b2 and voltages from 7-10V. For rough grinding, the current is 120-300 A\/cm\u00b2, while for fine grinding, it is 5-6 A\/cm\u00b2.<\/p>\n
Machining Gap<\/h2>\n
At a given voltage, a smaller machining gap results in higher current density, increased productivity, and improved surface flatness and precision. However, if the gap is too small, the electrolyte may not distribute evenly, leading to spark discharge and increased wheel wear. The typical machining gap is 0.025-0.05mm.<\/p>\n
Grinding Pressure<\/h2>\n
Increasing grinding pressure enhances productivity, but excessive pressure reduces the electrolytic gap, increasing the risk of spark discharge. Conversely, insufficient pressure leads to incomplete removal of the oxide layer, reducing both efficiency and surface quality. Therefore, grinding pressure should be set to avoid spark discharge while ensuring complete oxide layer removal. The recommended grinding pressure is 0.2-0.5 MPa.<\/p>\n
Contact Area Between Workpiece and Grinding Wheel<\/h2>\n
A larger contact area allows the DC power supply to deliver higher current, increasing productivity while maintaining good surface quality. Therefore, during electrolytic grinding, the grinding wheel and workpiece should maintain the largest possible contact area.<\/p>\n
Grinding Wheel Speed<\/h2>\n
Increasing the grinding wheel speed ensures adequate and rapid electrolyte supply in the gap, enhancing mechanical grinding and productivity. However, the speed should not be excessively high. The typical linear speed of the grinding wheel is 1200-2100 m\/min.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Electrolyte Supply<\/h2>\n
The electrolyte flow rate should ensure sufficient and uniform entry into the machining gap. For vertical electrolytic surface grinders, the flow rate is typically 5-15 L\/min, while for cylindrical grinders, it is 1-6 L\/min. The installation of the electrolyte nozzle is crucial, as it helps confine the electrolytic action to the machining gap between the grinding wheel and the workpiece. The nozzle must be firmly installed close to the outer surface of the grinding wheel and equipped with an air scraper to break the air layer on the rotating wheel’s outer edge. The electrolyte pressure is generally 14-70kPa, and the temperature is controlled between 19-33\u00b0C.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0915\u0930\u094d\u0937<\/h1>\nHigh Productivity<\/h2>\n
Electrolytic grinding of carbides offers 4-8 times higher productivity than conventional mechanical grinding, especially when the contact area between the conductive diamond grinding wheel and the carbide\u00a0workpiece is increased.<\/p>\n
Excellent Surface Quality<\/h2>\n
Electrolytic grinding of carbides achieves high surface quality, with typical surface roughness of Ra 0.4\u03bcm or better, and can reach Ra 0.025\u03bcm, producing a mirror-like finish. Increasing the machining current does not significantly affect surface quality. Additionally, the processed surface does not develop internal stresses or heat-affected zones, resulting in high surface integrity unmatched by other machining methods.<\/p>\n
High Precision<\/h2>\n
With advancements in carbide\u00a0electrolytic grinding, the use of diamond electrolytic grinding wheels that can perform both electrolytic and mechanical grinding allows for high precision. After electrolytic grinding, the power can be turned off, and mechanical grinding can be performed to achieve precision comparable to conventional mechanical grinding.<\/p>\n
Low Grinding Wheel Wear<\/h2>\n
In electrolytic grinding, the abrasive particles in the grinding wheel primarily maintain the electrolytic gap and remove the oxide layer, reducing abrasive wear. The wear of diamond grinding wheels in electrolytic grinding is significantly lower than that in conventional mechanical grinding.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In summary, electrolytic grinding of carbide<\/a>s offers unique advantages over conventional machining methods, significantly improving productivity, surface quality, and precision, making it an ideal method for machining carbides.<\/div>\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
With the rapid development of modern industry, carbide\u00a0materials, used as molds and structural components, have garnered significant interest due to their high hardness, wear resistance, and high-temperature durability. However, these properties also pose challenges in machining. Extensive research has been conducted to address these difficulties, leading to the development of electrolytic grinding as a method…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":23387,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-materials-weekly"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u56fe\u72471-3.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23386"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23393,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23386\/revisions\/23393"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meetyoucarbide.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}